![]() Honestly, I'm still stressing about the display options. As soon as brands let us know about their macOS Big Sur compatibility, we will update this article and database as we did with our MacOS 10. (I have just a couple of plugins I use are not cross compatible). Installing Pro Tools 10 on macOS Sierra (the right way) Maximilian Schmidt 366 subscribers Subscribe 1.1K 246K views 5 years ago Installing Pro Tools 10 on macOS Sierra without the need of. I will use Mojave for fun, but for recording I will continue with PT10 with Mountain Lion and PT12 with Yosemite. But check the forums on some of the audio gear websites for people with experience. Pro tools 12.4 actually works fine with Mojave, but there is just something about the response and stability with older OSx. I'm making assumptions, but I'd be surprised if geving up some single-core performance for more cores, to a point, isn't the right way to go. This may have not been true in the past, where a single UI thread could tax the cpu pretty heavily. On the flip side, I'm a plugin developer, and I'd go for more cores and ignore any minor slowing of the individual cores, no contest. And if you're not pushing it, then it's not an issue either way.įull disclosure: While I do overwhelm my ancient SSD-enhanced 2009 Mac Pro 8-core way too easily (I have at least one plugin that by itself is too power hungry to run reliably in real time), I probably will be hitting the new Mac pretty lightly (guessing)-I don't do giant sessions, I just record me (plenty of virtual instruments and plugins). That is, if you're doing something that is really pushing the cpu in any manner with a large audio project, I suspect a multicore system is going to beat faster single-core performance every time. The problem is, that it seems Protools is not selling any versions of Protools before Protools 12. I am currently using garage band but would really like to upgrade to protools. For audio, this is going to trump single-core performance. I have an old Mac running OSX 10.6.8 that I use solely for music production (basically just vocal recording and vocal editing). Just saying for those that really need to minimize cost, the move from 8 to 12 for $1k is more significant than the move from 12 to 16 for another $1k.īut to the single-core issue that several mention here, cpu-hungry audio plugins really benefit from multiple cores. Click to expand.OK, in case you missed it, I got the 16-core for the same reasons as you are contemplating. 3 Ben Jenssen Lives for gear 10 years A PT perpetual license version 2020 will let you run any version between 10 and current. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |